The Influence of AI-Powered Personalized Feedback Systems on Motor Skill Development and Self-Efficacy in PE Learning among University Students in Heilojiang, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v4i2.12.2025Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, personalized feedback, motor skill development, self-efficacy, physical educationAbstract
This study explored the purported benefits of AI-powered personalized feedback systems on university students' motor skill development and self-efficacy within physical education (PE) in Heilongjiang, China. Employing a quantitative, quasi-experimental design, the research sought to compare an AI-feedback group against a control receiving traditional instruction. While the analysis reported robust, statistically significant improvements across all measured motor skill performance indicators and substantial gains in self-efficacy within the AI-feedback group, a critical interpretation is warranted. These preliminary findings, though seemingly positive, originate from a design that, by its quasi-experimental nature, may not fully eliminate confounding variables inherent to educational settings. The reported "very strong" and "significant" improvements in the experimental group, while statistically compelling, lack direct comparative between-group statistical measures in the provided summary, thus preventing a definitive claim about AI's superiority over traditional methods based on this excerpt alone. While the internal gains within the AI group are clear, the extent to which these surpass the improvements of a rigorously controlled traditional group remains to be fully demonstrated. Nonetheless, the observed magnitude of change strongly suggests a notable impact, implying that AI-powered feedback holds considerable potential to address the logistical challenges of individualized instruction in large PE classes, thereby fostering enhanced learning outcomes and bolstering self-efficacy. Future research employing more rigorous comparative analyses with actual data and incorporating qualitative insights is crucial to fully validate and contextualize these promising preliminary results.
References
Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140527–140527. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623046851
Baena-Morales, S., & González-Víllora, S. (2023). Physical education for sustainable development goals: reflections and comments for contribution in the educational framework. Sport, Education and Society, 28(6), 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2045483
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: a Review. IEEE Access, 8(8), 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Estevan, I., Bardid, F., Utesch, T., Menescardi, C., Barnett, L. M., & Castillo, I. (2021). Examining early adolescents’ motivation for physical education: Associations with actual and perceived motor competence. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(4), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1806995
Goodyear, V., Skinner, B., McKeever, J., & Griffiths, M. (2021). The influence of online physical activity interventions on children and young people’s engagement with physical activity.
Guo, Q., & Li, B. (2021). Role of AI physical education based on application of functional sports training. 40(2), 3337–3345. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-189373
Hsia, L. H., Hwang, G. J., & Hwang, J. P. (2024). AI-facilitated reflective practice in physical education: An auto-assessment and feedback approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5267-5286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2212712
Jaboob, M., Hazaimeh, M., & Al-Ansi, A. M. (2025). Integration of generative AI techniques and applications in student behavior and cognitive achievement in Arab higher education. International journal of human–computer interaction, 41(1), 353-366.
Lander, N., Lewis, S., Nahavandi, D., Amsbury, K., & Barnett, L. M. (2022). Teacher perspectives of online continuing professional development in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 27(4), 434-448.
Lee, H. S., & Lee, J. (2021). Applying Artificial Intelligence in Physical Education and Future Perspectives. Sustainability, 13(1), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010351
Lindsay, R. S., Larkin, P., Kittel, A., & Spittle, M. (2023). Mental imagery training programs for developing sport-specific motor skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(4), 444-465.
Palmer, K. K., Stodden, D. F., Ulrich, D. A., & Robinson, L. E. (2021). Using Process- and Product-oriented Measures to Evaluate Changes in Motor Skills across an Intervention. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 25(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2021.1876069
Xiao, W., Soh, K. G., Wazir, M. R. W. N., Talib, O., Bai, X., Bu, T., Sun, H., Popovic, S., Masanovic, B., & Gardasevic, J. (2021). Effect of Functional Training on Physical Fitness Among Athletes: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 738878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.738878
YanRu, L. (2021). An artificial intelligence and machine vision based evaluation of physical education teaching. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(2), 3559-3569.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xiaowei Han

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.