The Impact of Organizational Commitment, Knowledge Sharing, and Psychological Safety on Innovative Behavior among SME Employees in Beijing Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v5i1.10.2026Keywords:
Organizational Commitment, Knowledge Sharing, Psychological Safety, Innovative Behavior, SMEsAbstract
This study examines the relationships among organizational commitment, knowledge sharing, psychological safety, and innovative behavior within small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) located in Beijing Province. Grounded in Social Exchange Theory and Psychological Safety Theory, a conceptual model is proposed wherein organizational commitment influences innovative behavior both directly and indirectly through knowledge sharing and psychological safety. Data were collected from 358 SME employees via a quantitative survey, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings indicate that organizational commitment significantly enhances innovative behavior, with knowledge sharing and psychological safety functioning as partial mediators. These results underscore the importance of relational and psychological mechanisms in fostering innovation within SME contexts. The study contributes to the theoretical literature on employee innovation by integrating commitment, knowledge sharing, and psychological safety, while offering practical implications for SME managers seeking to cultivate an innovation-supportive culture. The findings further suggest that although parents express utilitarian educational aspirations, their purchasing behaviors are primarily driven by emotional needs and socioeconomic distinction. This research provides theoretical insights into the "Parenting Economy" and presents strategic implications for publishers regarding product positioning and market segmentation.
References
Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate1. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.932
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Lu, L., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Zhu, S. (2022). Relationship between paternalistic leadership and employee innovation: A meta-analysis among Chinese samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920006
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
Nonaka, I. (1998). The knowledge-creating company. The Economic Impact of Knowledge, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1
Stranzl, J. (2024). Blau (1964): Exchange and power in Social Life. Schlüsselwerke Für Die Strategische Kommunikationsforschung, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45292-6_43
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
