Empirical Lifecycle Assessment of Generative AI Inference Carbon Emissions: Global Trends and the Malaysian 'Carbon Arbitrage' Risk (2023–2030)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v5i17.1.2026Keywords:
Generative AI, Carbon Arbitrage, Life Cycle Assessment, Jevons Paradox, MalaysiaAbstract
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into global digital infrastructure has initiated a profound structural shift, transitioning the primary environmental impact of machine learning from discrete model training events to continuous, distributed inference workloads. This research addresses the critical problem of unquantified and geographically externalised carbon emissions resulting from the exponential growth of GenAI queries, specifically focusing on the vulnerability of emerging markets in the Global South to digital carbon arbitrage. Utilising an Attribution-Based Life Cycle Assessment (A-LCA) framework compliant with ISO 14044 standards, this study models global GenAI inference emissions from 2023 to 2025 and employs logistic regression forecasting alongside Monte Carlo simulations to project demand through 2030. The primary results demonstrate that while specialised hardware and algorithmic optimisations successfully reduced the energy intensity of median text queries to 0.34 Wh per interaction, the accompanying surge to one billion daily interactions completely negated these efficiency dividends. This dynamic resulted in a calculated rebound elasticity of 1.08, providing strict statistical validation of the Jevons paradox within the artificial intelligence sector. Furthermore, a comparative location penalty analysis reveals that processing identical computational workloads in Malaysia’s fossil-heavy grid, compounded by tropical thermodynamic cooling constraints, yields a carbon footprint approximately 42 times higher than identical deployments in temperate, low-carbon regions. The study concludes that the unmanaged influx of hyperscale inference data centres poses a systemic risk to Malaysia’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) targets, necessitating an urgent regulatory paradigm shift from traditional Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) metrics to comprehensive Carbon Usage Effectiveness (CUE) standards.
References
Aguero, J. R., Takayesu, E., Novosel, D., & Masiello, R. (2017). Modernizing the grid: Challenges and opportunities for a sustainable future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 15(3), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2017.2660819
Elsworth, C., Huang, K., Patterson, D., Schneider, I., Sedivy, R., Goodman, S., ... & Manyika, J. (2025). Measuring the environmental impact of delivering AI at Google Scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15734. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.15734
Energy Commission of Malaysia. (2024). Grid emission factor (GEF) in Malaysia. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Suruhanjaya Tenaga.
International Energy Agency. (2025). Energy and AI. Paris, France: IEA.
Jelassi, T. (2025). Smarter, smaller, stronger: Resource-efficient generative AI and the future of digital transformation. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Li, B., Jiang, Y., Gadepally, V., & Tiwari, D. (2024, November). Sprout: Green generative AI with carbon-efficient LLM inference. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 21799-21813). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1215
Liu, J., Tang, P., Wang, W., Ren, Y., Hou, X., Heng, P. A., ... & Li, C. (2024). A survey on inference optimization techniques for mixture of experts models. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3794845
Jernite, Y., & Strubell, E. (2024, June). Power hungry processing: Watts driving the cost of AI deployment?. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 85-99). https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658542
Malaysian Investment Development Authority. (2024). Guideline for sustainable development of data centre. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: MIDA.
Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry. (2025). Data centre task force strategic resolutions. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: MITI.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability. (2025). Malaysia's third iteration of the nationally determined contribution (NDC 3.0). Bonn, Germany: UNFCCC Secretariat.
Ngo, L. (2025). Regulating the cloud: Cross-border data transfer regulation and the geography of hyperscale cloud infrastructure. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-202601221897
Rincé, S., & Banse, A. (2025). EcoLogits: Evaluating the environmental impacts of generative AI. Journal of Open Source Software, 10(111), 7471. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.07471
Vlontzos, G., & Pardalos, P. M. (2017). Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.054
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
