Applicant Perceptions of AI Recruitment and Organizational Attractiveness: The Person-Environment Fit Mechanism from an Algorithm Aversion Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v5i2.1.2026Keywords:
Artificial intelligence recruitment, algorithm aversion, person-environment fit, organizational attractiveness, technology anxietyAbstract
The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in recruitment has raised important questions about its unintended consequences for talent attraction. While prior research has emphasized the efficiency and accuracy benefits of AI-driven hiring, limited attention has been given to how such practices are interpreted by job applicants and how these interpretations shape organizational evaluations. Drawing on signaling theory and person–environment fit theory, this study conceptualizes AI recruitment as an ambivalent organizational signal that simultaneously conveys efficiency and impersonality. It proposes that applicant perceptions of AI recruitment influence organizational attractiveness through perceived person–environment fit, which functions as a key interpretive mechanism linking technological signals to organizational evaluations. Furthermore, this process is theorized to be contingent upon both individual and situational factors, such that technology anxiety amplifies negative interpretations, whereas perceived job technicity attenuates them. A between-subjects experimental design with 300 job seekers provides empirical support for the proposed model. Results indicate that perceived AI recruitment is negatively associated with organizational attractiveness and that this relationship is partially mediated by person–environment fit. In addition, the indirect effect is stronger among individuals with higher levels of technology anxiety and weaker when the job is perceived as highly technical. This study makes three contributions. First, it shifts the focus of AI recruitment research from organizational outcomes to applicant-centered interpretive processes. Second, it advances theory by identifying person–environment fit as a central mechanism through which ambivalent technological signals are translated into organizational evaluations. Third, it extends research on algorithm aversion by demonstrating that responses to AI in recruitment are systematically shaped by both individual differences and task characteristics. Overall, the findings highlight a critical paradox: technologies adopted to enhance efficiency and objectivity may simultaneously undermine organizational attractiveness. These insights contribute to a more nuanced understanding of AI adoption in recruitment and its implications for talent acquisition.References
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., & Varma, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in human resource management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, *33*(1), Article 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100925
Burton, J. W., Stein, M. K., & Jensen, T. B. (2020). A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, *33*(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2155
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, *87*(5), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task-dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, *56*(5), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851788
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, *144*(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Hickman, L., Bosch, N., Ng, V., Saef, R., Tay, L., & Woo, S. E. (2022). Automated video interview personality assessments: Reliability, validity, and generalizability investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, *107*(8), 1323–1351. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000695
Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, *63*(6), 986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258403
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, *58*(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Papathanasiou, M. (2019). Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12246
Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., & Roundtree, R. (2003). The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research, *56*(11), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00276-4
Oostrom, J. K., Holtrop, D., Koutsoumpis, A., van Breda, W., Ghassemi, S., & de Vries, R. E. (2024). Applicant reactions to algorithm- versus recruiter-based evaluations of an asynchronous video interview and a personality inventory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, *97*(1), 160–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12466
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, *88*(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, *87*(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, *61*(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
