Constitutional Challenges Amidst the Development of Digital Technology in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v3i1.9.2024Keywords:
Constitutional challenges, digital technology, IndonesiaAbstract
Constitution holds a very fundamental part in nation and in state. Every change in the society cannot be legally implied without looking back to it. The change includes the development of digital technology. Digital technology can be a potential but also can be at threat. It gets more serious as human creations namely artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, e-commerce, e-court and e-government do support digitalization but also challenging for constitutional matters because it really affects nation and state. So, it is needed to be addressed very carefully. This research uses a normative juridical approach and described analytically. The results of this research show that artificial intelligence can put democracy in danger, constitution must be able to ensure that democracy can use the potential applications of blockchain technology, regulations regarding e-commerce must use UUD 1945 Articles 25A, 32, and 33 as the main rule, Constitutional Court creates an innovation with technology and continues to maintain public trust with its e-court system and there is still no regulations and policy for e-government to control problems such as mitigation and environment.
References
Adame, M. M. (2022). Technology and constitution. Revista de Derecho Uninorte, 56, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.14482/dere.56.342
Adhani, H. (2021). Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia di Era Digital: Upaya Menegakan Konstitusi, Keadilan Substantif dan Budaya Sadar Berkonstitusi. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, 2(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v2i2.11763
Anugrah, M., Syahid, M. N., Sahri, Azka, F. M., & Anwar, M. S. (2023). Tantangan Hukum dan Peran Pemerintah dalam Pembangunan E-Commerce di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(05), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i05.354
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Cate, F. H., & Cate, B. E. (2012). The Supreme Court and information privacy. International Data Privacy Law, 2(4), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ips024
Firmandayu, N., & Elfaki, K. E. (2023). The Electronic Government Policy-Based Green Constitution Towards Good Governance. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues, 1(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v1i2.11
Herian, R. (2019). Regulating Blockchain: Law, Technology and the Ethics of Political Economy. Routledge.
Khanal, R., & Pokharel, T. (2022). Innovating Public Service: The System Thinking Approach. Prashasan: Nepalese Journal of Public Administration, 53(1), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.3126/prashasan.v53i1.46332
Marcia, M. (2022). The role of constitutional courts in taming adverse impact of new technologies in the criminal proceedings. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 8(1), 153–188. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.678
Marwan, A. (2023). Apakah Sarjana Hukum Bisa Digantikan Dengan Teknologi Kecerdasan Artifisial? AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.654
Mik, E. (2018). Blockchains: A technology for decentralized marketplaces?. Impact of Technology on International Contract Law: Smart Contracts and Blockchain Technologies, Forthcoming (pp. 1-17). Scribbr. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3264565
Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089
Pollicino, O., & De Gregorio, G. (2021). Blockchain and Public Law: An introduction. In Blockchain and Public Law (pp. 1-11). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100796.00005
Rahman, F., & Wicaksono, D. A. (2021). Researching References on Interpretation of Personal Data in the Indonesian Constitution. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.187-200
Santoso, A. P. A., & Habib, M. (2023). Relasi Filsafat Ilmu, Hukum, Agama Dan Teknologi. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 7(1), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.4146
Sari, D. K., Hasfi, N., Santosa, H. P., Prastya, T. L. N. M., Isnaini, S., Romadlan, S., Adawiyah, S. El, Suwarto, Swarnawati, A., Prabowo, A., Arofah, K., Lestari, S. B., Santoso, E., & Mas’Amah. (2015). Information and Communication Technology, dan Literasi Media Digital (I. P. Hadi (ed.); First). ASPIKOM.
Simoncini, A., & Longo, E. (2021). Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law in the Algorithmic Society. Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society, 2103(February), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.003
Sinaga, N. A., & Atmoko, D. (2023). Kesiapan Sistem Hukum Indonesia Dalam Transformasi Masyarakat Dari 4.0 Menuju 5.0. Krtha Bhayangkara, 17(1), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i1.2111
Slobogin, C., & Brayne, S. (2023). Surveillance Technologies and Constitutional Law. Annual Review of Criminology, 6, 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-035102
Valcke, P., Clifford, D., & Dessers, V. K. (2021). Constitutional Challenges in the Emotional AI Era. In Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society (Issue June 2020, pp. 57–77). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.005
Wang, F. F. (2010). Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adissya Mega Christia, Yudhistira Rizqi Mahardhika, Mya Fajar Ramadhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
