The Urgency of Implementing Plea Bargaining in Resolving Corruption Crime Cases in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v3i1.10.2024Keywords:
Plea bargaining, corruption crime, special routeAbstract
The research aims to determine the application of plea bargaining or the defendant's admission of guilt as a reform of criminal procedural law in Indonesia. Using a normative juridical method will compare the laws of one country with another, along with existing norms. The concept of the defendant's admission of guilt as the basis for the judge's consideration of imposing criminal sanctions for corruption provides fresh air that the law must create a judicial process that is simple, fast and low cost. The birth of the concept of plea bargaining, which is currently included in the Draft Criminal Code, is expected to solve the problem of the complexity of the judicial process and the costs that must still be incurred when taking the judicial route.
References
Adriyani, A. N., & Wahidin, M. I. S. (2024). The Role of the Prosecutor's Office in Implementing Plea Bargaining: A Study in the Indonesian Judicial System. DELICTUM: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 2(2), 10-10. https://doi.org/10.35905/delictum.v2i2.8906
Almi, A. A. (2023). Plea Bargaining System as a Non-Litigation Settlement In The Framework of Repositioning Criminal Justice In Indonesia. Andalas Law Journal, 8(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.25077/alj.v8i1.40
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1362
Ariyani, W., Tara, E. D., Utomo, A. P., & Naswa, A. S. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus-Kasus Pidana Melalui Kekuatan Media Sosial Pada Era Digitalisasi di Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dies Natalis Universitas Muria Kudus, 2(1), 1355-1364. Scribbr. https://conference.umk.ac.id/index.php/sndies/article/view/543
Barama, M. (2016). Model Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perkembangan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(8), 8-17.
Campbell, M. C., & Schoenfeld, H. (2013). The transformation of America’s penal order: A historicized political sociology of punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5), 1375-1423. https://doi.org/10.1086/669506
Garoupa, N., & Stephen, F. H. (2008). Why plea-bargaining fails to achieve results in so many criminal justice systems: A new framework for assessment. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(3), 323-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X0801500303
Hermawati, R. (2023). Studi Perbandingan Hukum “Plea Bargaining System” di Amerika Serikat dengan “Jalur Khusus” di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 4(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v4i1.351
Johnson, T. (2019). Public perceptions of plea bargaining. Am. J. Crim. L., 46, 133.
Kisekka, N. G. (2020). Plea bargaining as a human rights question. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1818935
Lumbantobing, A. P., & Sitepu, S. (2023). Comparison Of Plea Bargaining in The United States With “Special Line” in The Draft Book of Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Indonesia. Bengkoelen Justice: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v13i2.31572
Nelson, F. M., & Santoso, T. (2020). Plea Bargaining in Corruption Cases: A Solution for the Recovery of Financial Losses by Indonesia?. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(2), 1233-1248.
Newman, B. (2023). Plea Bargaining with Wrong Reasons: Coercive Plea-Offers and Responding to the Wrong Kind of Reason. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09680-w
Octarina, F. N., & Faridah, U. (2021). The Role of Legal Advisors in Criminal Case Settlement Process. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), 9342-9352. Scribbr. http://repository.narotama.ac.id/1206/
Putra, A., Dwiono, S., & Iqbal, M. G. (2024). Reform Of The Criminal Procedure Law And Criminal Law Enforcement In Indonesia. LEGAL BRIEF, 12(6), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i6.909
Ruchoyah, R. (2020). Urgensi Plea Bargaining System dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Plea Bargaining System di Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 388-409. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art9
Simbolon, B. F. M. T., Syahrin, A., & Ablisar, M. (2022, February). Juridical Review of Comparative Prosecution Systems in Indonesia and the United States of Prosecutors Based on Restorative Justice. In Second International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development (ICOPOSDEV 2021) (pp. 85-91). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220204.014
Suyoto, S. (2017). Peranan Polri Dalam Perlindungan Terhadap Saksi Dan Korban Pada Proses Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Suara Keadilan, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v18i1.3083
Tristanto, Y. W. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Plea Bargaining Untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Peradilan Di Indonesia. AHKAM Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.411-436
Walgrave, L. (2013). Integrating criminal justice and restorative justice (1st Ed.). In Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 559-579). Willan.
Widianto, M. S., Amarini, I., & Kartini, I. A. (2020). Plea Bargaining in Realizing Effective and Efficient Criminal Justice Systems. UMPurwokerto Law Review, 1(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.30595/umplr.v1i1.8051
Ziyad, Z. (2018). Konsep Plea Bargaining Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara. Badamai Law Journal, 3(1), 80-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.32801/damai.v3i1.6059
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Hanif Firmansah, Wiwit Ariyani, Suyoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
