The Relationship of Psychological Contracts and Distributive Justice Organizational Citizenship Behavior Employee

Authors

  • Jefri Effendy Hakim Department of Psychology, University of 17 August 1945 Surabaya, East Java, INDONESIA
  • Andik Matulessy Department of Psychology, University of 17 August 1945 Surabaya, East Java, INDONESIA
  • Rr Amanda Pasca Rini Department of Psychology, University of 17 August 1945 Surabaya, East Java, INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v3i1.11.2024

Keywords:

Relationship, psychological contract, distributive justice, citizenship, behavior

Abstract

This research aims to test whether the psychological contract and distributive justice affect employee organizational citizenship behavior. This type of research is explanatory research using a quantitative approach. The subjects of this research were 179 employees of PT. Research data was analyzed using Multiple Linear Regression analysis. The results of the first analysis show that R square is 0.511 or 51.1%. This means that the proportion of variance in organizational citizenship behavior explained by aspects of the psychological contract and distributive justice is 51.1%, while the remaining 48.9% is influenced by other variables outside this research. Second, an F test is carried out with a sig value of 0.000 if (sig < 0.05), then the null hypothesis which states that there is no significant relationship between the psychological contract variable and distributive justice on organizational citizenship behavior is rejected. This means that there is a significant relationship between the psychological contract variable and distributive justice on organizational citizenship behavior. Third, a t test (partial) was carried out to see the regression equation of the two independent variables on the dependent variable. The result is that if sig < 0.05, then the resulting regression coefficient relationship is significant to the dependent variable and vice versa. In this research it can be seen that the independent variable has a sig value of 0.00, which means that the independent variable has a significant relationship with the dependent variable.

References

Abdullah, A. B. M. (2017). Managing the psychological contract: Employee relations in South Asia. Springer.

Aeknarajindawat, N., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Does organization justice influence the organization citizenship behavior, job satisfaction & organization outcomes. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(1), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2020.1.61

Aldridge, V. K., Dovey, T. M., & Wade, A. (2017). Assessing test-retest reliability of psychological measures. European Psychologist, 22(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000298

Al-Zu'bi, H. A. (2010). A study of relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 102.

Ayu, A., & Febrian, W. D. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada PT. Ultra Teknologi Indonesia). BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(4), 1146-1162. Scribbr. https://www.journal.mediapublikasi.id/index.php/bullet/article/view/3533

Barling, J., Clegg, S. R., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Volume Two: Macro Approaches (Vol. 2). Sage.

Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological bulletin, 120(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189

Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science (pp. 159-200.

Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford University Press, USA.

Đorđević, B., Ivanović, Đ. M., Lepojević, V., & Milanović, S. (2019). The influence of organizational justice on corporate performances. Strategic Management, 24(3), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan1903014D

Estreder, Y., Rigotti, T., Tomás, I., & Ramos, J. (2020). Psychological contract and organizational justice: the role of normative contract. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2018-0039

Febrian, W. D., & Sani, I. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Implementation of Talent Management for Crewing in Shipping Companies to Organizational Sustainability. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 3(5), 1837-1848. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v3i5.5792

Fernández-Marcos, T., de la Fuente, C., & Santacreu, J. (2018). Test–retest reliability and convergent validity of attention measures. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25(5), 464-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1329145

Galanis, G., & Veneziani, R. (2022). Behavioural utilitarianism and distributive justice. Economics Letters, 215, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110488

Herrera, J., & Las Heras-Rosas, D. (2021). The organizational commitment in the company and its relationship with the psychological contract. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609211

Jasso, G., Törnblom, K. Y., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Distributive justice. Handbook of social justice theory and research, 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_11

Jufri, M., Jalal, N. M., Aras, M., & Asri, A. (2018, October). The effect of psychological contracts and organizational commitments to the performance of employees. In 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018) (pp. 1189-1194). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.250

Kanfer, R., & Chen, G. (2016). Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.002

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Mentari, R. R., & Ratmawati, D. (2020, February). Linking distributive justice and procedural justice to employee engagement through psychological contract fulfillment (a field study in Karmand Mitra Company Andalan, Surabaya). In 3rd Global Conference On Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2018) (pp. 199-203). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200131.044

Miller, D. (2017). Distributive justice: What the people think (1st Ed.). In Distributive justice (pp. 135-173). Routledge.

Ocampo, L., Acedillo, V., Bacunador, A. M., Balo, C. C., Lagdameo, Y. J., & Tupa, N. S. (2018). A historical review of the development of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and its implications for the twenty-first century. Personnel Review, 47(4), 821-862. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2017-0136

Organ, D. W. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time (1st Ed.). In Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance (pp. 85-97). Psychology Press.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7

Pratt, M. G. (2014). Social identity dynamics in modern organizations: An organizational psychology/organizational behavior perspective (1st Ed.). In Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 13-30). Psychology Press.

Santoro, G., Fiano, F., Bertoldi, B., & Ciampi, F. (2018). Big data for business management in the retail industry. Management Decision, 57(8), 1980-1992. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0829

Subramanian, K. R. (2017). Psychological contract and transparent leadership in organisations. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 2(1), 60-65.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Hakim, J. E., Matulessy, A., & Rini, R. A. P. (2024). The Relationship of Psychological Contracts and Distributive Justice Organizational Citizenship Behavior Employee. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v3i1.11.2024